You never stated how she came into the room. This matters. She may have seen you before you saw her which is generally the case. Remember, women are highly perceptive of space.
Never really thought of that this never occurred to me at all to me she came in all casual and nonchalant I vaguely remember it.
Standing in front of you and turning her head are not coincidence man. ASK YOURSELF WHAT THE FUCK IS INTERESTED ABOUT THE BACK OF MCDONALDS TO A GROWN WOMAN, THE PLAY PEN?
Considering the environment where everything is close and where the weather isn't exactly fantastic I don't know if she walked there or drove she could've done it for convenience for all I know, and in this particular McDonalds it was too small for a playpen.
Uh how many more signs do you need?
I was waiting to see if she would glance my way with some sort of eye contact, to me that would've confirmed the other evidence I was stacking but since she didn't, I just brushed it off as me possibly projecting attraction which was probably really coming from me.
Her looking out the window with extra movement is to show off her neck and probably the best features of her body
True when a person tilts their head to the side that is a sign of submissiveness I forgot about that.
If it was all torso movement pay attention to her legs next time. The legs and feet don't lie.
Really why is that
THIS IS THE FUCKING PROBLEM WITH LOOKING FOR SIGNS OF JOCKING. JOCKING IS NOT CHOOSING. I FEEL LIKE THIS IS THE 3rd TIME I'VE SAID THIS ON THE FORUM IN THE PAST WEEK.
Break it down for me then pimpin' what is the difference so I can be sure which is which and to make sure I got my point across loud and clear.
YOU'VE BEEN ON THIS FORUM LONG ENOUGH TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE GEAR OF TALKING TO A BITCH.
Mouthpiece isn't an issue its a prevalent energy of approval seeking I'm still currently dealing with and finding out why it consumes me so much. Even so I know eventually I will have to confront it by approaching a broad and getting it over with for I know its truly the only way I can get past it.
Most men are not supplicating/supplicating. You are not supplicating/even more not supplicating/ neutral/bring the wood/ Go hard/hook her with not needing her etc.
What??
How hard do you need to be approached to get the idea to speak to woman?
If this is their way of approaching I really need to up my sensitivity and sub communication game.
FINALLY, HOW MANY WOMEN ORDER INSIDE MCDONALDS AND SIT DOWN TO EAT IN THAT SHIT HOLE WITHOUT WANTING SOME CONVERSATION? ANSWER, NOT A LOT. THERE IS NO ATTRACTIVE ATMOSPHERE TO A WOMAN IN THAT PLACE.
Depends on the environment I've actually seen where I stay at a lot do post up there and grub, while in the suburbs not as much, most likely because there is a lot of offices where its located by as well and everyone just goes for a lunch break.
TUCK YOUR TONGUE BACK IN
Projecting much aren't we

she had it going on but nowhere close to have me feeling or acting like that I just got a thing for round bubble backsides .

1. Ah man, stop taking everything I say so literally. There is nothing interesting in the back of the Mcdonalds.
2. How are you still even possibly projecting attraction if you don't agree with my point about tucking your tongue back in? I put that shit in there for a reason. Obviously, you didn't hit the cue so your heuristics aren't "projecting attraction" heuristics which means you either don't know when you are or don't project attraction.
3. Legs and feet don't lie. Think about the mind. Grinus posted a video about the feminism that talked about our lizard brains. We have only recently got the ability to separate torso and lower body movements. Consequently, when a person is consciously orienting their upper body they usually forget about their lower body, and thus their lower body gives away their real thoughts because the mind is naturally occupied with another movement.
Think units and sections instead of individual pieces. There's more stuff I could point out, but that won't help you yet because you're still implicitly worried about the difference between conscious and subconscious movements.
4. You can have a woman that's jocking like looking your direction and even making eye contact with you, but her whole body isn't engaged your way. You can have a woman that's not looking at you, but the rest of her body is engaged in grabbing your attention.
That's an implicit admission that she is ready to choose up or lose out.. Your case is exactly my point. While you were steady looking for the pieces of jocking you missed the pie of possible choosing. That's why I've been saying run up the damn avenue. If it's not good then you get to confirm and reject evidence after the fact and you learn faster.
5. I was being facetious with that statement to make a point about gears of talking to women, but you should in principle have different gears of talking to women. Why? Every woman is different and needs to be talked to in generally different ways.
6. Ok. Mouthpiece isn't the issue. I'm only talking from experience. When I was consumed with approval seeking I was also unsure of exactly what I should be saying. When I took the jump to start finding out what I should be saying more than whether or not I'm approval seeking my issue with approval seeking died. I started firing and cutting off bad females real quick. Some of them ran and others ran back with better attitudes.
7. Yes, you do get approached in very minute ways to the UNTRAINED eye. This is why I suggest running up every avenue that has any potential even if you don't see the woman jocking you because you'll start to see correlations faster. The faster you see correlations the faster you learn. Most of the time if a woman is going to BEAT you over the head with signs in the way that you're thinking about then she'll just come up and speak to you, but the majority of the time they are beating you over the head with signs to stay within the framework of the matrix and be able to claim innocence.
8. Aight, have it your way on environment about Mcdonalds. It's more complex than just the suburbs and the city. My friend and I had a long debate about that shit.
9. No. I'm not projecting. As a matter of fact, I could give a rat ass about asses unless it's the fattest one on the planet because I'm more of a face person.
See my earlier response. You didn't respond to my cue in the way that I thought you would, meaning you have different heuristics than I thought. Recognize your heuristics man. You're obviously not caught up in that shit meaning you should be doing the opposite of sitting still.
We actually blew two women that were staring at us they walked in.
On the subject of being perceptive and communicating effectively, did anyone else spot this?
I understand what you meant by it, but ... yeah.
Whatever point you're stating you're right about it. That phrasing is bad. To actually think I can blow a female that wasn't already going to blow me off is wrong. The principle behind me stating that is that I didn't think those females would be receptive to either of us approaching them at that specific point in time. However, I thought it prudent to look up that avenue because I had nothing to lose, and I wanted to take the lead because my friend's in your face style wouldn't have been productive. The point is that I looked up that avenue at a later point. The difference in context is important. We both had repped ourselves a whole lot more right before I talked to them because we had talked about some other topics, and they got to hear about our car, my ice, fly clothes, lavish trips my partner has had women take him on, etc.