There have been a few good threads about indifference recently, with some very insightful replies, which has gotten me thinking a lot about it. Then, Flow83 pointed me to some good videos exploring it further over at the Balls Project, which further expanded my view on the subject.
The threads here that I was referring to are:
Mine (Indifference, red pill, or ?):
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2703
Roark's (After The Red Pill):
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2727
and Moose35's (I don't even know who I am anymore):
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=2719
So, here's some of my insights:
The three of us seem to have gone through similar experiences where we become indifferent/apathetic to interactions with women. I'm going to call this Indifference 1.0. Here's my definition:
Indifference 1.0: A lack of investment in the outcome of an interaction (or a potential interaction) with a girl due to apathy.
For Roark, Moose, and I, the apathy seems to be what came out of negative feelings that surrounded the process of swallowing the red pill and starting to wake up to the reality of the social matrix.
I call this indifference caused by apathy rather than just apathy because from a behavioral standpoint it does look like indifference. In my thread I talked about some girls at the gym, and my lack of action to talk to them was due to apathy, but if they had talked to me, and continued pushing the interaction with me further and further despite my apathy, I would have let it continue and probably would have even helped move the interaction along, but I would have been totally indifferent to the results.
As a side note, I also see the apathy itself as an indication of still not having fully accepted the truth (ie, still feeling the effects of the red pill). If I were to fully fully accept the truth of the world, then I wouldn't feel down/depressed/disappointed about it, which is what caused my apathy, so therefore I must still not fully accept the nature of the way things are.
This is where some of the words of GP Walsh from the Balls Project really helped me:
We're so attached to things, that we need to go to the opposite (indifference) to understand what that is. But if you get stuck there, you're just as lost as if you were still stuck in attachment.
The point isn't to go into indifference because thats the right position, but rather the point is to go there because now thats available to you, so that you can exercise the wisdom of when do you care and when you are indifferent.
And also from GP Walsh:
Indifference is a quality that most of us haven't learned because we don't have the inner strength to say "I'm letting go of those results." We think that its not giving a shit, but thats not it. Its about being indifferent to my inner pain about not getting the results I wanted, and letting that pain be there.
With those in mind, here's what seems to me to be the next step (which I'm going to call Indifference 2.0):
Indifference 2.0: Truly and fully accepting everything for the way it is, and therefore not being attached to any one particular outcome, because all outcomes are accepted, even the ones that cause pain/disappointment/other negative emotions.
To me, this second definition allows for some leeway to hope that an interaction can turn out well, to hope that a girl can live up to my standards, to hope that a girl can be an x-factor, etc. Now it does not allow getting attached to that idea of course, but it does allowing a curiosity to see if one of those positive outcomes might be the case.
Like GP Walsh says "Its about being indifferent to my inner pain about not getting the results I wanted, and letting that pain be there." If you have curiosity about seeing if a girl is an x-factor, and then she's not, there's going to be a pang of disappointment, because you wanted her to be, otherwise you wouldn't have even given her a chance. That might seem on the surface to not be indifference, but as long as you are ok with the pain of disappointment and you can let it go, then I think that can be part of being indifferent.
So then the question becomes how do you move from Indifference 1.0 to Indifference 2.0? To me this seems like it can't just be a purely conscious process, but instead has to be part of a process that incorporates both conscious and sub-conscious minds. For me it has been pretty easy to get the conscious understanding of all this stuff, but the hard part is the subconscious part, since you can't force that.
What I've been doing is laid out in this post:
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=2719#p26058
The Just Allow It course has really been excellent so far. I'm still less than a quarter of the way through it, but I feel like its really helped me quite a lot so far.
So, with that all said, anyone have any insights/reflections/thoughts?