There's been a misunderstanding...

I'm talking about which guys get sex on an equal basis with women without the need for payment other than their presence.

When women hit 30 (age 30) and above, these girls look for stable men with good paychecks to settle down with once they're done whoring with the guys they really like.

The trick is these stable guys were ignored all through their 20s and early 30s in many cases and their only chance for a sex life is to marry. The women in these cases use sex very freely to trap the man, once married the sex stops and there is hell to pay. That's why the cliches about wedding cake destroying woman's sex drive. It's not the cake, there is no need for sex now that the man is trapped...

That would be insulting enough but after 5-7 years most of these guys end up divorced and enslaved because she only wanted his paycheck, the man himself is only a necessary evil. Now with the courts in her pocket the woman can have the paycheck without the man.

However many of these girls do end up alone because they wait too long and guys are wising up to this scam . They say "why should I pay with my life for what everyone else got for free"?

When women hit 30 (age 30) and above, these girls look for stable men with good paychecks to settle down with once they're done whoring with the guys they really like.

The trick is these stable guys were ignored all through their 20s and early 30s in many cases

and their only chance for a sex life is to marry.

The women in these cases use sex very freely to trap the man

Makes for a nice and even value exchange that will last, yeah?

This statement is wrong. Because these women in their late twenties and 30's now will fuck me.

You think so?

Ponder this: every second that goes by, your value increases whilst hers decreases.

You'd have to meet her when hers is way way above yours for it be even vaguely even after say 10 years, let alone 20, or 30.. Start thinking about 40+ and they have to be so out of balance it is not funny.

Yes, and if you as a "stable guy" can recognize that a woman is doing that for those type of reasons and you don't like it. You can just get easy entrance and plenty sex, and just stay unattached.
It's the perfect way for me "mr. stable guy" to make up abit for the times from my late teens untill my mid-twenties when i wasn't able to get much sex from women. And maybe the "cool" and older guys were being given that, for now it's my time and prime years comming up.
i don't want to "waste" my prime years (dating value wise) being married to a woman, whom can take me to the cleaners (financially) if she wants to.
I think I would consider the option of marriage maybe when I couldn't get women, but those times seem to have passed.

Ponder this: every second that goes by, your value increases whilst hers decreases.

You think so?

Ponder this: every second that goes by, your value increases whilst hers decreases.

You'd have to meet her when hers is way way above yours for it be even vaguely even after say 10 years, let alone 20, or 30.. Start thinking about 40+ and they have to be so out of balance it is not funny.

Value is subjective not objective. In a metaframe sense yeah it's status and wealth, but there's different things that play out in individual situations. People "value" different things based on their life experiences...that's what "cherry picking" is for.

I'm so fucking proud of you right now...very well put!

Value is subjective not objective. In a metaframe sense yeah it's status and wealth, but there's different things that play out in individual situations. People "value" different things based on their life experiences...that's what "cherry picking" is for.