| Natural Freedom http://www.naturalfreedom.info/ |
|
| Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. http://www.naturalfreedom.info/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=2168 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | peregrinus [ Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. |
Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qySx8tSs8BQ Short but sweet |
|
| Author: | Jared [ Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. |
|
|
|
| Author: | The Kidd!! [ Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. |
Who is this guy/are these people?  He did get owned tho
|
|
| Author: | Altair [ Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:11 am ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. | |
Who is this guy/are these people?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepak_Chopra He did get owned tho From the context...I would say that this guy is someone who is speaking against various religions and toting enlightenment/eastern philosophy as the way. That guy that pwned him would be a religious person of some sort...just a guess though |
||
| Author: | Scarf [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 6:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. |
Never read his work. A bit fluffy for my taste. It would have been interesting to see if he had a rebuttal as there were ways out of his situation. He really should have said 'no' though. There would have been ways out of that too. |
|
| Author: | Dali [ Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:43 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. | |
Never read his work. A bit fluffy for my taste.
It was a lingüistical logical trap. Lingüistic paradox?It would have been interesting to see if he had a rebuttal as there were ways out of his situation. He really should have said 'no' though. There would have been ways out of that too. I guess It's like this sentence: "This sentence is false." True or False? You know is true that is false, but how can be true if the same sentence indicates the contrary (all the content of it, is false), then some sort of like endless loop gets generated by trying to [run] this sentence in your mind. The Levels of meaning of the sentences must be dealt with. |
||
| Author: | Altair [ Sun Apr 22, 2012 2:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. |
Circular Reasoning |
|
| Author: | Merrick [ Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:13 am ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. | |
Circular Reasoning
key word was believe.. Paradoxical play of words.
|
||
| Author: | Sniper [ Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:20 am ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. | |
Never read his work. A bit fluffy for my taste.
I read three of his books a few years ago- most of what he said just went over my head, didn't find anything profound in his work. But I haven't read all his books....
It would have been interesting to see if he had a rebuttal as there were ways out of his situation. He really should have said 'no' though. There would have been ways out of that too. |
||
| Author: | Merrick [ Sun Apr 22, 2012 4:30 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. | |
I read three of his books a few years ago- most of what he said just went over my head, didn't find anything profound in his work. But I haven't read all his books....
If you did not take anything away from 3 books of the same author I doubt reading his other ones is gonna change anything.
|
||
| Author: | Slim Titan [ Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:26 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | Re: Deepak Chopra Gets Owned. | ||
Never read his work. A bit fluffy for my taste.
It was a lingüistical logical trap. Lingüistic paradox?It would have been interesting to see if he had a rebuttal as there were ways out of his situation. He really should have said 'no' though. There would have been ways out of that too. I guess It's like this sentence: "This sentence is false." True or False? You know is true that is false, but how can be true if the same sentence indicates the contrary (all the content of it, is false), then some sort of like endless loop gets generated by trying to [run] this sentence in your mind. The Levels of meaning of the sentences must be dealt with. "This sentence is false" is true because meaning is not necessarily structured in the mind. There has to be tangible objects for meaning to apply to in some cases. This is one of those cases. The sentence is turned into a metaphorical object. So, the sentence has existential truth. Thus, the sentence is true. |
|||
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC+01:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|