If you absolutely must have some pussy, then you will do whatever it takes to get past security (intrigue, keep attention, fuck) then (hopefully) steal the ball later. If the ball steal is unsuccessful, you must either finish how you start or abort the mission. This shit is not rocket science.

if you wait long enough I'm sure some of the others will be along in short order

At some point, doing all the work just isn't worth the effort....

Yeah I know what you mean, but if he stays the same way (beta extreme) isn't her attraction to him going to die? Assuming ball stealing was unsuccessful. BTW I never seen so much ODA from a dude, I doubt he has slightest clue about the game.

I was always doing the masculine thing (however in LTRs went to beta - we all know what it meant) soit is kinda difficult to grasp for me.

then you will do whatever it takes to get past security (intrigue, keep attention, fuck)

Not sure what ODA means. But basically if you really to delve into it not that you need to but here is how it works. There is a stream of information a full spectrum say it's like a rainbow. With ball stealing and going along with surface level games what you are doing is saying here look at this small piece of the rainbow while everything else continues to happen under the surface.

Your not beta, your creating something for her to consciously focus on while the alpha works in her brain underneath the surface.

That masculinity your thinking you have is attachment to the outcome, it wouldn't waver at a certain point in the interaction unless your putting too much weight on weither or not she thinks your a man.

displays of affection behavior that I have never seen before. Always thought it was a turn off for women but it works for him.

Internal / mindset > behavior.
There are always people who do things that "shouldn't" work, that are massively successful (in all fields) who seem to break rules because of where the behavior is coming from.

It is also clear from both questions that you want a formula that says x thing always = x result (he is doing this behavior so she shouldn't like it. 

This other behavior means the relationship has to fail) - when dealing with two human beings who all have their own issues and a billion variables I've found it to be fairly useless pursuit. There are trends and general truths, which become self obvious. I prefer to put the energy on focusing on myself and being comfortable with doing what I want regardless of whose philosophies it goes against, which is deeply confronting and hard but proving more rewarding than learning a so called correct way to do things. This does not rule out learning from experts and what works of course but it is about where it is coming from. Some things may in fact work well, or some things you want to do/be may have statistically lower success rates, but NO amount of so called success with women is worth selling yourself out IMHO.

That was good explanation to problem I suffered with for some time, as reiketer now is..

I guess the tl;dr version is --

It is difficult to describe a *behavior* as inherently "alpha" or "beta" or whatever. On paper it's - the guy was publicly affectionate or did something like write poetry (!?) but where they are coming from is everything. The action itself is not what makes something alpha, beta, masculine, feminine etc. -- but ok yeah, the most important thing to me is my undying love for you hurts my skull to read But, who knows or really cares wtf is going on with those two in the end..
:

My take is, if what really determines the quality of a behavior is the mindset, and most of the behaviors come from mindset, and most of the actions come from mindset, I would put all of my attention on my own internal mindset, notice what *I* think is "alpha" or "beta" and see if that's really true or if it's a projection of mine..