Hi there Kidd. I've read part of your first posts, and it's good to see there are parts that I like and parts I don't (everything that seems to bring reactions in me is of my interest).
As simplicity moves me right now more than over thinking (as I tended to do a lot in the past), I'll share a mental summary of the core ideas I found behind what I read: that you teach women to act in the way you prefer, by using what some women do but in the other direction: sex as a tool to get things from men, by giving them great sex as a prize at the times when we got from them what we want to get from them in the future; and never going for sex coming from neediness of it. Please, let me know if this is accurate.
So, this looks too egoist for my liking, it requires holding second intentions in mind... I'm "too much" of a "good person" for that. But it still fits somewhat in me, it resonates with me... how come? In this way:
By totally letting go of desires, concretely my sexual desires, I won't go looking for sex from neediness... in fact, I won't go looking for sex or anything else ever (when I let go of that desires, observe how they come and go from my experience, not acting upon them). Okay, one step done, now the next one: By acting from feelings, and consciously choosing the right time in which acting to desires feels right... Regarding sexual desires, consider sex as a gift for the girl, and only make sex to her (in make case "sexually love" her) at my peak happiest state, and the time where I overflow with love. So, no need for second intentions, moment by moment acting (and reaction avoidance) gets me pretty much at the same place where I want, in a similar way that you do, with her programmed that when I'm this happy I can gift her in that way. She can work on her own to help me reach those states, so it's a win, win, win situation. And being as I am, too superficial things won't be enough, but the real deal
Brilliant.
Maybe some part of this thought process is wrong, but certainly I see some gold in it.
Thanks!!